Anthropology and history
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17184/eac.anthropen.060Keywords:
cross-disciplinary, colonial studies, methodology, ethnohistory, historical anthropologyAbstract
This article focuses on the dialogue between anthropology and history during the 20th century until now. It pays particular attention to the contributions associated with the Annales School, the Manchester School, as well as to the development, over time, of new fields of research such as ethnohistory, historical anthropology or new history, and the new colonial studies.
References
Balandier, G. (1951), «La situation coloniale: approche théorique». Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, vol.11, p.44-79. https://doi.org/10.3917/cis.110.0009
Bayart, J.-F. et R. Bertrand (2006), «De quel “legs colonial” parle-t-on?» Esprit, n°330, p.134-160. https://doi.org/10.3917/espri.0612.0134
Bensa, A. (2010), «Anthropologie et histoire». Dans Christian Delacroix, François Dosse, Patrick Garcia et Nicolas Offenstadt (dir.), Historiographies. Concepts et débats I, Paris, Gallimard, coll. Folio Histoire, p.42-63.
Biersack, A. (dir.) (1991), Clio in Oceania: Toward a Historical Anthropology. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press.
Bloch, M. (1983) [1924], Les rois thaumaturges. Étude sur le caractère surnaturel attribué à la puissance royale, particulièrement en France et en Angleterre. Paris, Gallimard, coll. Bibliothèque des Histoires.
Borosfsky, R. (dir.) (2000), Remembrance of Pacific pasts: An invitation to remake history. Honolulu, University of Hawai’i Press.
Braudel, F. (1990) [1949], La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l’époque de Philippe II. Paris, Armand Colin.
– (1958), «Histoire et science sociale: la longue durée». Annales - Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations, vol.13, n°4, p.725-753. https://doi.org/10.3406/ahess.1958.2781
Burguière, A. (1999), «L’anthropologie historique et l’école des annales». Les Cahiers du Centre de recherches historiques, n°22. http://ccrh.revues.org/index2362.html
Clifford, J. et G.E. Marcus (dir.) (1986), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Comaroff, J. et J. Comaroff (2010), «L’échelle inconfortable de l’ethnographie. Anthropologie postcoloniale et violence de l’abstraction». Dans J. Comaroff et J. Comaroff, Zombies et frontières à l’ère néo-libérale, Paris, Les Prairies ordinaires.
Cooper, F. et L.A. Stoler (dir) (1997), Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World. Berkeley, University of California Press.
de L’Estoile, B. (2008), «The Past as it Lives Now: an Anthropology of Colonial Legacies». Social Anthropology/Anthropologie sociale, vol.16, n°3, p. 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2008.00050.x
Dening, G. (1980), Islands and Beaches, Discourse on a Silent Land: Marquesas 1774-1880. Honolulu, University of Hawai’i Press.
Dosse, F. (1986), «Les habits neufs du président Braudel». EspacesTemps, n°34-35, p.83-93. https://doi.org/10.3406/espat.1986.3356
Douglas, B. (1998), Across the Great Divide: Journeys in History and Anthropology. Amsterdam, Harwood Academic Publishers.
Evans-Pritchard, E.E. (1962), «History and Anthropology». Dans E.E. Evans-Pritchard, (dir.), Essays in Social Anthropology, New York, The Free Press of Glencoe, p.46-65.
Fabian, J. (2006) [1983], Le Temps et les autres. Comment l’anthropologie construit son objet. Toulouse, Anacharsis.
Fisher, M.J. et G.E. Marcus (dir.) (1986), Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Frazer, J.G. (1998) [1924], Le Rameau d’Or. Paris, Robert Laffont, coll. Bouquins, 4 tomes.
Geertz, C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, Basic Books.
Ginzburg, C. (1983), The Night Battles: Witchcraft and Agrarian Cults in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203819005
Gluckman, M. (1940), «Analysis of a Social Situation in Modern Zululand». Bantu Studies, vol.14, p.1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02561751.1940.9676107
Goody, J. (1979) [1977], La Raison graphique. La domestication de la pensée sauvage. Paris, Minuit.
– (1997), «Histoire et anthropologie. Convergences et divergences». Ethnologie française, vol.17, n°3, p.282-293. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40989895
Harkin, M.E. (2010), «Ethnohistory’s Ethnohistory: Creating a Discipline from the Ground Up». Social Science History, vol.34, n°2, p.113-128. http://muse.jhu.edu/article/381460
Hartog, F., (2014) [2004], «Le regard éloigné. Lévi-Strauss et l’histoire». Dans M. Izard et Y.-J. Harder (dir.), Claude Lévi-Strauss, Paris, Flammarion, coll. Champs, p.287-306. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsehess.1388
Iggers, G.G. (1997), Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge. Middletown, Wesleyan University Press.
Krech III, S. (1991), «The State of Ethnohistory». Annual Review of Anthropology, vol.20, p.345-375. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2155805
Kuper, A. (2000), Culture: The Anthropologists’ Account. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1958) [1949], «Histoire et ethnologie». Dans C. Lévi-Strauss, Anthropologie structurale, Paris, Plon, p.3-33.
– (1962), La pensée sauvage. Paris, Plon.
– (1983), «Histoire et ethnologie». Annales ESC, n°38, p.1217-1231. https://www.persee.fr/doc/ahess_0395-2649_1983_num_38_6_411017
– (1988), De près et de loin. Entretiens avec Didier Eribon. Paris, Odile Jacob.
Lloyd, G.E.R. (1994), Pour en finir avec les mentalités. Paris, La Découverte.
Merle, I. et M. Naepels (2003), «Comme à la limite de la mer…». Dans I. Merle et M. Naepels (dir.), Les rivages du temps. Histoire et anthropologie du Pacifique, Paris, L’Harmattan, coll. Cahiers du Pacifique Sud contemporain, p.11-321.
Naepels, M. (2010), «Anthropologie et histoire: de l’autre côté du miroir disciplinaire». Annales. Histoire, Sciences sociales, vol.65, n°4, p. 873-884. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0395264900036787
– (2011), Ethnographie, pragmatique, histoire. Paris, Publications de la Sorbonne, coll. Itinéraires.
Poloni-Simard, J. et C. Bernand (2014), «Un historien-anthropologue en Amérique». Dans J.C. Garavaglia, J. Poloni-Simard et G. Rivières (dir.), Au miroir de l’anthropologie historique, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes, p.7-12. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.43726
Sahlins, M. (1981), Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities: Structure in the Early History of the Sandwich Islands Kingdom. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6773
– (1985), Islands of History. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Said, E.W. (1989), «Representing the Colonized: Anthropology’s Interlocutors». Critical Inquiry, vol.15, n°2, p.205-225. https://doi.org/10.1086/448481
Schmitt, J.-C. (2008), «Anthropologie historique». Bulletin du centre d’études médiévales d’Auxerre | BUCEMA, hors-série n°2. https://doi.org/10.4000/cem.8862
Shöttler, P. (2010), «Annales». Dans C. Delacroix, F. Dosse, P. Garcia et N. Offenstadt (dir.), Historiographies. Concepts et débats I, Paris, Gallimard, coll. Folio Histoire, p.33-41.
Sibeud, E. (2004), «Post-Colonial et Colonial Studies: enjeux et débats». Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, vol.5, n°51-4bis, p.87-95. https://doi.org/10.3917/rhmc.515.0087
Singaravélou, P. (dir.) (2013), Les empires coloniaux, XIXe-XXe siècle. Paris, Le Seuil, coll. Points. http://www.seuil.com/ouvrage/les-empires-coloniaux-pierre-singaravelou/9782757828434
Stoler, A.L. (2009), Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton, Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/titles/8821.html
– (2016), Duress: Imperial Durabilities in our Times. Durham, Duke University Press. https://www.dukeupress.edu/duress
Stoler, A.L., C. Mcgranahan et P.C. Perdue (dir.) (2007), Imperial Formations. Santa Fe, SAR Press.
Thomas, N. (1989), Out of Time: History and Evolution in Anthropological Discourse. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
– (1990), Marquesan Societies: Inequality and Political Transformation in Eastern Polynesia. New York et Oxford, Clarendon/Oxford University Press.
Trigger, B.G. (1982), «Ethnohistory: Problems and Prospects». Ethnohistory, vol.29, n°1, p.1-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/481006
Valeri, V. (1985), Kinship and Sacrifice: Ritual and Society in Ancient Hawaii. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Watchel, N. (1971), La vision des vaincus. Les Indiens du Pérou devant la Conquête espagnole, 1530-1570. Paris, Gallimard.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Anthropen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise stated, content comprised on this website, including text, photographs, illustrations, trademarks, logos, audio or video clips, is protected by copyright law. All rights, titles and interests in the content belong exclusively to Anthropen. With the exception of works licensed under CC BY NC ND 4.0 any copying, reproduction, distribution, total or partial modification is strictly prohibited without the written permission of Anthropen and may expose the offender to legal sanctions.