Border

Authors

  • Nicoletta Diasio Université de Strasbourg, Faculté des Sciences Sociales, UMR CNRS 7367 Dynamiques Européennes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17184/eac.anthropen.033

Keywords:

Centre-periphery, Alterity, Liminality, Decentration, Hegemony, Geopolitics

Abstract

After a quick analysis of the place of the frontier and its different forms in anthropology, this article shows how liminality constitutes an epistemological position allowing to value non-hegemonic knowledge, to account for the power relations between sciences as well as for the socio-political conditions of their production and valorization.

References

Agier, M. (2013), La condition cosmopolite, Paris, La Découverte. https://editionsladecouverte.fr/catalogue/index-La_condition_cosmopolite-9782707174086.html

Appadurai, A. (1996), Modernity at large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.

Balandier, G. (1988), Le désordre. Éloge du mouvement, Paris, Fayard.

Barth, F. (1969), Ethnic groups and boundaries, Oslo, Johansen & Nielsen.

Bhabha, H. (1994), The Location of Culture, London, Routledge.

Brubaker, R. et F. Cooper (2000), « Beyond ‘Identity’ », Theory and Society, 29, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007068714468

Donnan, H. et T.M. Wilson (dir.) (1998), Border Identities. Nation and State at International Frontiers, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Douglas, M. (1966), Purity and Danger, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

Pian, A. (2009), Aux nouvelles frontières de l’Europe. L’aventure incertaine des Sénégalais au Maroc, Paris, La Dispute. https://ladispute.atheles.org/mondialisations/auxnouvellesfrontieresdeleurope/

Pratt, M.L. (1992), Imperial eyes, London, New York, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932933

Turner, V.W (1969), The Ritual Process. Structure and Anti-Structure, Usa, Aldine Publisher.

Van Gennep, A. (1995) [1922], Traité comparatif des nationalités, Paris, Éditions du C.H.T.S.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-18