Intersectionality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17184/eac.anthropen.111Keywords:
Feminism, Power relation, Domonation, Opression, MethodologyAbstract
The article takes a look at the history of the development of the concept of intersectionality. The article also sheds light on the various ways of working in an intersectional manner. Insisting on the extreme disciplinary and methodological variety of the works that mobilize it, it shows that this notion is not so much a unified theory as a vast field of transnational research.
References
Bettie, J. (2000), «Women without class: Chicas, cholas, trash, and the presence/absence of class identity», Signs, vol.26, p.1-36. https://doi.org/10.1086/495566
Carby, H. (1982), «White Woman Listen! Black Feminism and the Boundaries of Sisterhood». Dans Center for Contemporary Cultural Studies (dir.), The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in Seventies Britain, Londres, Hutchinson, p. 212-235.
Chauvin, S. et A. Jaunait (2015), «L’intersectionnalité contre l’intersection», Raisons politiques, vol.58, p.55-74. https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.058.0055
Cho, S., K. Crenshaw et L. McCall (2013), «Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis», Signs. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol.38, n°4, p.785-810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608
Crenshaw, K. (2016), «“Les voyages de l’intersectionnalité”». Dans M. Rocca i Escoda, F. Fassa et É. Lépinard (dir.), L’Intersectionnalité. Enjeux théoriques et pratiques, Paris, La Dispute, p.29-51.
Crenshaw, K. (1991), «Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color», Stanford Review of Law, vol.43, p.1241-1299.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Crenshaw, K. (1989), «Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics», University of Chicago Legal Forum, n°1, p.139-167.
http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf
Davis, A. (1981), Women, Race and Class, New York, Random House.
Anthias, F. et N. Yuval-Davis (1992), Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle, Londres, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203992920
Fox-Genovese, E. (1988), Within the plantation household, Chapel Hill et Londres, University of North Carolina Press.
Galerand, E. et D. Kergoat (2014), «Consubstantialité vs intersectionnalité? À propos de l’imbrication des rapports sociaux», Nouvelles pratiques sociales, vol.26, n°2, p.44-61. https://doi.org/10.7202/1029261ar
Hill Collins, P. (2000), Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, New York, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203900055
Kergoat, D. (2012), Se battre, disent-elles, Paris, La Dispute.
Kergoat, D. (2001), «Le rapport social de sexe. De la reproduction des rapports sociaux à leur subversion», Actuel Marx, vol.30, p.60-75. https://doi.org/10.3917/amx.030.0085
Kergoat, D. (1978), «Ouvriers = ouvrières? Propositions pour une articulation théorique de deux variables: sexe et classe sociale», Critiques de l’économie politique, vol.5, p.65-97.
Mazouz, S. (2015), «Faire des différences. Ce que l’ethnographie nous apprend sur l’articulation des modes pluriels d’assignation», Raisons politiques, vol.58, p.75-89. https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.058.0075
Roca i Escoda, M., F. Fassa et É. Lépinard (dir.) (2016), L’Intersectionnalité. Enjeux théoriques et pratiques, Paris, La Dispute.
Sandoval, C. (2000), Methodology of the Oppressed, Minneapolis, University of Minesota Press.
Viveros Vigoya, M. (2017), Les Couleurs de la masculinité. Expériences intersectionnelles et pratiques du pouvoir en Amérique du Sud, Paris, La Découverte.
West, C. et S. Fenstermaker (1995), «Doing Difference», Gender and Society, vol.9, n°1, p.8-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124395009001002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Anthropen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise stated, content comprised on this website, including text, photographs, illustrations, trademarks, logos, audio or video clips, is protected by copyright law. All rights, titles and interests in the content belong exclusively to Anthropen. With the exception of works licensed under CC BY NC ND 4.0 any copying, reproduction, distribution, total or partial modification is strictly prohibited without the written permission of Anthropen and may expose the offender to legal sanctions.