Tribute
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17184/eac.anthropen.129Keywords:
Economical anthropology, Gift exhanges, State anthropology, Chinese History (History), SocietiesAbstract
Si le tribut n’est pas un don selon la définition de Testart, il peut en prendre l’apparence, être présenté comme un abandon librement consenti. Et s’il ne donne pas lieu à une contrepartie exigible, il est néanmoins souvent justifié au nom d’une contrepartie rendue sous forme de services.
References
Amin, S. (2011), Eurocentrism. Modernity, Religion and Democracy: A Critique of Eurocentrism and Culturalism, Monthly Review Press.
Athané, F. (2011), Pour une histoire naturelle du don, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, Collection Pratiques théoriques.
Feuchtwang, S. (1992), The Imperial Metaphor: Popular Religion in China, London, Routledge.
Friedman, J. (1987), « Eric Wolf: Europe and the People Without History », European Sociological Review, Vol. 3, no1, p. 83-85.
Gates, H. (1996), China’s Motor: A Thousand Years of Petty Capitalism, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
Goody, J. (2006), The Theft of History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (édition française : Le vol de l’histoire, Paris, Gallimard, 2010).
Graeber, D. (2006), « Turning modes of production inside out: Or, why capitalism is a transformation of slavery. » Critique of Anthropology, Vol. 26, no1, p. 61–85.
Graeber, D (2014), « On the Moral Grounds of Economic Relations. A Maussian Approach », Journal of Classical Sociology, Vol. 14, no1, p. 65-77.
Hertz, E. (1998), The Trading Crowd: An Ethnography of the Shanghai Stockmarket, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Robertson Smith, W. (1889), Lectures on the Religion of the Semites, Edinburgh, Adam and Charles Black.
Sahlins, M. (1994), « Cosmologies of Capitalism: The Trans-pacific Sector of ‘the World System » in Culture/Power/ History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory, Nicholas Dirks, Geoff Eley, and Sherry Ortner (dir.), Princeton, Princeton University Press, p. 414-416
Scubla, L. (2005), « Le sacrifice a-t-il une fonction sociale? » Pardès, Vol. 39, no2, p.143-159. doi:10.3917/parde.039.0143.
Terray, E. (1995), Une histoire du royaume abron du Gyaman. Des origines à la conquête coloniale, Paris, Karthala.
Testart, A. (2007), Critiques du don : Études sur la circulation non marchande, Paris, Syllepse.
Trémon, A-C. (2019), Pour la cause de l’ancêtre. Relation diasporique et transformations d’un village globalisé, Shenzhen, Chine, Nanterre, Société d’ethnologie.
Wang, M. (2012), « All Under Heaven: Cosmology and Ethnographies of Imperial China », Journal of Ethnographic Theory, Vol. 2,no1, p. 337-383.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Anthropen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise stated, content comprised on this website, including text, photographs, illustrations, trademarks, logos, audio or video clips, is protected by copyright law. All rights, titles and interests in the content belong exclusively to Anthropen. With the exception of works licensed under CC BY NC ND 4.0 any copying, reproduction, distribution, total or partial modification is strictly prohibited without the written permission of Anthropen and may expose the offender to legal sanctions.