Migratory process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47854/anthropen.v1i1.51263Keywords:
Society, Immigration, Geopolitics, Corporealization of politics, Individuals, BordersAbstract
The migratory process refers to the dynamism and particularities of the sequence of situations encountered by a person or group. Phenomena and experiences intertwine or overlap from the moment people begin the process of leaving their place of origin, through to the moment of settlement and eventual inclusion in the host society. Three stages are associated (premigratory, migratory and post-migratory), but there is no linearity or fixed duration of time, due to the dynamism of the situations. This entry follows on from "Migration" (2017) and takes this notion a step further, addressing what constitutes the migration experience in the variability of experiences, but also what brings them together.
References
Abou, S. (2006), « L’intégration des populations immigrées », Revue européenne des sciences sociales. European Journal of Social Sciences, vol. XLIV, n°135, p. 79 91. https://doi.org/10.4000/ress.256.
Barth, F. (1956), « Ecologic Relationships of Ethnic Groups in Swat, North Pakistan », American Anthropologist, vol. 58, n°6, p. 1079-1089. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1956.58.6.02a00080.
Barth, F. (dir.) (1969), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference, Boston, Little, Brown and Co.
Berry, J. (1994), « Acculturation and Psychological Adaptation : An overview », in A-M. Bouvy, F. van de Vijver, P. Boski, et P. Schmitz (dir.), Journeys into Cross-Cultural Psychology. Amsterdam, S & Z.
Brettel, C. (2015), « Theorizing Migration in Anthropology : The Cultural, Social, and Phenomenological Dimensions of Movement », in C. Brettell et J.F. Hollifield (dir.), Migration Theory: Talking Across Disciplines, New York et Londres, Routledge, p. 148-197.
Brown, L. et I. Holloway (2008), « The Initial Stage of the International Sojourn : Excitement or Culture Shock ? », British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, vol. 36, no1, p. 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880701715689.
Brubaker, R. (2002), Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.
Carpentier, N. et D. White (2013), « Perspective des parcours de vie et sociologie de l’individuation », Sociologie et sociétés, vol. 45, no1, p. 279-300. https://doi.org/10.7202/1016404ar.
De Lima, P. (2017), International Migration : The Well-Being of Migrants, Édimbourg, Dunedin.
Devereux, G. (1985), Ethnopsychanalyse complémentariste. Paris, Flammarion.
Elias, N. (1978), What Is Sociology ? Londres, Hutchinson.
FitzGerald, D. (2009), A Nation of Emigrants: How Mexico Manages Its Migration, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Frozzini, J., A. Gonin et M.-J. Lorrain (2019), « Dynamiques interculturelles en milieu de travail et associatif. Des enjeux incontournables pour une participation démocratique des néo-Québécois », Communiquer – Revue de communication sociale et publique, no25, p. 79-97. https://doi.org/10.4000/communiquer.4071.
Glick Schiller, N., L. Basch et C. Blanc-Szanton (1992), « Towards a Definition of Transnationalism », Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 645, no1, p. ix-xiv. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb33482.x.
Guerraoui, Z. (2009), « De l’acculturation à l’interculturation. Réflexions épistémologiques », L’Autre, vol. 10, no2, p. 195-200. https://dx.doi.org/10.3917/lautr.029.0195.
Gullahorn, J.T. et J.E. Gullahorn (1963), « An Extension of the U-Curve Hypothesis », Journal of Social Issues, vol. 19, no3, p. 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1963.tb00447.x
Haller, W., A. Portes et S.C. Lynch (2011), « Rejoinder : On the Dangers of Rosy Lenses – Reply to Alba, Kasinitz and Waters », Social Forces, vol. 89, no3, p. 775-781.
Heyman, J. (2005), « Migrations », in H. James Birx (dir.), Encyclopedia of Anthropology, Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage, p. 1598-1600.
Herskovitz, M.J. (1938), Acculturation. The Study of Culture Contact, New York, Austin. https://archive.org/details/acculturationstu00hers/page/154/mode/2up?view=theater.
Hofstede, G.H. (2001), Culture’s Consequences : Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage Publications.
Hilado, A. et M. Lundy (dir.) (2018), Models for Practice with Immigrants and Refugees: Collaboration, Cultural Awareness and Integrative Theory, Los Angeles, Sage.
Honneth, A. (1996), The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Inghammar, A. (2010), « The Employment Contract Revisited: Undocumented Migrant Workers and the Intersection between International Standards, Immigration Policy and Employment Law », European Journal of Migration and Law, vol. 12, no2, p. 193-214. https://brill.com/view/journals/emil/12/2/article-p193_4.xml?language=en.
Kim, Y.Y. (2001), Becoming Intercultural: An Integrative Theory of Communication and Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage Publications.
Lagier, E. (2016), « Parcours migratoires des parents et rapport des enfants à la politique. La part de l’histoire migratoire familiale dans la socialisation politique des descendants d’immigrés », Recherches familiales, vol. 13, no1, p. 21-33. https://www.cairn.info/revue-recherches-familiales-2016-1-page-21.htm.
Linton, R. (1936), The Study of Man: An Introduction, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Lysgaard, S. (1955), « Adjustment in a Foreign Society : Norwegian Fulbright Grantees Visiting the United States », International Social Science Bulletin, no7, p. 45-51.
Paik, A.N. (2020), Bans, Walls, Raids, Sanctuary: Understanding U.S. Immigration in the Twenty-First Century, Oakland (CA), University of California Press.
Park, R.E. et E.W. Burgess (dir.) (1992 [1925]), The City : Suggestions for Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Parker, N. et N. Vaughan-Williams (2012), « Critical Border Studies : Broadening and Deepening the “Lines in the Sand” Agenda », Geopolitics, vol. 17, no4, p. 727-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.706111.
Portes, A. et R.G. Rumbaut (2014), Immigrant America: A Portrait, Berkeley (CA), University of California Press.
Pritchard, R. (2011), « Re-entry Trauma : Asian Re-integration After Study in the West », Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 15, no1, p. 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315310365541.
Redfield, R., R. Linton et M.J. Herskovits (1936), « Memorandum for the Study of Acculturation », American Anthropologist, vol. 38, no1, p. 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1936.38.1.02a00330.
Rocher, G. (2010), Introduction à la sociologie générale, Montréal, Hurtubise.
Sagynbekova, L. (2016), The Impact of International Migration. Process and Contemporary Trends in Kyrgyzstan, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Sakamoto, I. (2011), « Acculturation or Negotiation ? What Japanese Academic Migrants Teach Us About Family Processes and Gendered Experiences of Cultural Adaptation », in R. Mahalingam (dir.), Cultural psychology of immigrants, New York, Lawrence Erlbaum, p. 337-364.
Salzbrunn, M. (2017), « Migration », Anthropen. https://revues.ulaval.ca/ojs/index.php/anthropen/article/view/30647.
Sayad, A. (2004), The Suffering of the Immigrant, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Vatz Laaroussi, M. (2019), « Les dynamiques d’intégration et d’inclusion des personnes et des familles immigrantes et réfugiées. Une responsabilité partagée », in L. Rachédi et B. Taïbi (dir.), L’intervention interculturelle, Montréal, Chenelière Éducation, p. 54-79.
Werbner, P. (2002), The Migration Process : Capital, Gifts and Offerings Among British Pakistanis, New York, Oxford, Bloomsbury Academic.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anthropen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise stated, content comprised on this website, including text, photographs, illustrations, trademarks, logos, audio or video clips, is protected by copyright law. All rights, titles and interests in the content belong exclusively to Anthropen. With the exception of works licensed under CC BY NC ND 4.0 any copying, reproduction, distribution, total or partial modification is strictly prohibited without the written permission of Anthropen and may expose the offender to legal sanctions.