La co-créativité pour la résolution de problèmes issus du monde réel en apprentissage par projet pour l’enseignement supérieur


  • Guillaume Isaac Université Côte d'Azur
  • Margarida Romero Université Côte d'Azur
  • Sylvie Barma Université Laval


Mots-clés :

créativité, co-créativité, résolution de problèmes, problèmes issus du monde réel, théorie historico-culturelle de l'activité, formation de concepts, enseignement supérieur, apprentissage par projet


La présente étude constitue un effort préliminaire pour cadrer la co-créativité, l’apprentissage par projet et la résolution de problèmes issus du monde réel sous la perspective de la théorie historico-culturelle de l’activité. Cet article propose d’établir la co-créativité comme une activité de formation de concepts en milieu naturel et une activité de médiation collective adaptée à la résolution de problèmes issus du monde réel en contexte d’enseignement supérieur. A ce titre, cette étude vise à faire le pont entre la co-créativité et le monde réel, par les connaissances, compétences et actions acquises en contexte de résolution co-créative de problèmes en enseignement supérieur.


Amabile, T. M. (2018). Creativity In Context : Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity (First edition., Vol. 1‑1 online resource : text file, PDF). Taylor and Francis;

Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning : A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 6‑23.

Beghetto, R. A. (2021). How times of crisis serve as a catalyst for creative action : An agentic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3735.

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). The genesis of creative greatness : Mini‐c and the expert performance approach. High Ability Studies, 18(1), 59‑61.

Boix Mansilla, V., & Schleicher, A. (2022). Big picture thinking (p. 106). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of Generalization in Instruction : Logical and Psychological Problems in the Structuring of School Curricula. Soviet Studies in Mathematics Education. Volume 2. ERIC.

Engeström, Y. (2013). Collective Concept Formation as Creation at Work. Learning and collective creativity: Activity-theoretical and sociocultural studies, 234.

Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding. Cambridge University Press.

Engeström, Y. (2020). Concept formation in the wild : Towards a research agenda. Éducation et didactique, 14‑2, 99‑113.

Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning : Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1‑24.

European Commission. (2017). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the regions on a renewed EU agenda for higher education (COM(2017) 247 final; p. 12).

European Commission. (2020). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the regions A new ERA for Research and Innovation (COM(2020) 628 final; p. 22).

Funke, J. (2021). It Requires More Than Intelligence to Solve Consequential World Problems. Journal of Intelligence, 9(3).

Giddens, A. (2003). Runaway world : How globalization is reshaping our lives. Taylor & Francis.

Glăveanu, V. P., Ness, I. J., Wasson, B., & Lubart, T. (2019). Sociocultural Perspectives on Creativity, Learning, and Technology. In C. A. Mullen (Éd.), Creativity Under Duress in Education? (Vol. 3, p. 63‑82). Springer International Publishing.

Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2016). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a Change Laboratory intervention. Journal of education and work, 29(2), 232‑262.

Hero, L.-M., & Lindfors, E. (2019). Students’ Learning Experience in a Multidisciplinary Innovation Project. Education & Training, 61(4), 500‑522. eric.

Isaac, G., Barma, S., & Romero, M. (2022). Cultural historical activity theory, double stimulation, and conflicts of motives in education science : Where have we been? (2012-2021). Revue internationale du CRIRES : innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, 5(2), 86‑94.

Jurdak, M. (2016). Activity Theory as a Foundation of Real-World Problem Solving in School Mathematics. In M. Jurdak, Learning and Teaching Real World Problem Solving in School Mathematics (p. 49‑78). Springer International Publishing.

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond Big and Little : The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1‑12.

Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., & Roberts, A. M. (s. d.). Creativity in the Schools : Creativity Models and New Directions. In Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools (p. 335‑345). Routledge.

Koppenhagen, F., Blümel, T., Held, T., Wecht, C., & Kollmer, P. D. (2021). The challenging combination of agility and convergence in hybrid product development processes : An empirical analysis of Stanford’s ME310 process model. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 2991‑3000.

Krauss, J., & Boss, S. (2013). Thinking through project-based learning : Guiding deeper inquiry. Corwin Press.

Lektorskii, V. (2004). Activity-based approach : Death or Rebirth. Metodologicheskie problemy sovremennoy psikhologii.

Lemmetty, S., Collin, K., Glăveanu, V. P., & Forsman, P. (2021). Creativity and Learning : Contexts, Processes and Support. Springer.

Leroy, A., & Romero, M. (2021). Teachers’ Creative Behaviors in STEAM Activities With Modular Robotics. 6, 152.

Mahon, K., Kemmis, S., Francisco, S., & Lloyd, A. (2017). Introduction : Practice theory and the theory of practice architectures. In Exploring education and professional practice (p. 1‑30). Springer.

Miettinen, R. (2001). Artifact Mediation in Dewey and in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(4), 297‑308.

Mitroff, I. I. (2020). Corona virus : A prime example of a wicked mess. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120071.

Nolen, S. B., Wetzstein, L., & Goodell, A. (2020). Designing Material Tools to Mediate Disciplinary Engagement in Environmental Science. Cognition and Instruction, 38(2), 179‑223.

OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume V) : Collaborative Problem Solving. OECD.

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods : Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 123‑138.

Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1974). Wicked problems. Man-made Futures, 26(1), 272‑280.

Sannino, A., & Ellis, V. (2015). Learning and Collective Creativity : Activity-Theoretical and Sociocultural Studies. Routledge.

Sarathy, V. (2018). Real World Problem-Solving. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 261.

Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition : Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. MIT Press.

Steiner, G. (2009). The Concept of Open Creativity : Collaborative Creative Problem Solving for Innovation Generation-a Systems Approach. Journal of Business & Management, 15(1).

Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Transformational vs. Transactional deployment of intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 9(1), 15.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity : Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 1, 3‑15.

Warr, M., & West, R. E. (2020). Bridging Academic Disciplines with Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning : Challenges and Opportunities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 14(1). eric.

World Economic Forum. (2015). New vision for education : Unlocking the potential of technology. British Columbia Teachers’ Federation Vancouver, BC.




Comment citer

La co-créativité pour la résolution de problèmes issus du monde réel en apprentissage par projet pour l’enseignement supérieur . (2022). Revue Internationale Du CRIRES : Innover Dans La Tradition De Vygotsky, 6(3), 86-99.