L’engagement d’élèves du primaire et du secondaire dans l’évaluation par les pairs renforcée par le numérique
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.51657/t5688849Mots-clés :
engagement, élèves, évaluation par les pairsRésumé
Cet article explore l'intégration de plateformes numériques dans l'évaluation en aide aux apprentissages, en se concentrant sur de nouveaux alignements entre les objectifs d'apprentissage et l’engagement des élèves dans la formulation de rétroactions à leurs pairs. Le cadre théorique s'appuie sur des perspectives socioculturelles de l'apprentissage qui soulignent l’importance du contexte dans la participation active des élèves en classe et leur engagement. Une méthodologie de recherche collaborative, basée sur l’expérimentation de devis, est employée pour développer ces nouveaux alignements permettant d’exploiter les possibilités de plateformes numériques en situation d’évaluation. Les résultats fournissent des descriptions détaillées de ces alignements et exemplifient les traces laissées par les élèves lors de l’exercice de leur jugement évaluatif à travers notamment leurs rétroactions à leurs pairs. Ces résultats apportent un éclairage nouveau sur l’engagement des élèves en classe en montrant comment l'évaluation en aide à l’apprentissage enrichit la qualité des interactions entre pairs.
Références
Aksela, O., Lämsä, J., et Järvelä, S. (2024). Secondary School Students’ Enacted Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Computer-Based Writing Task–Insights from Digital Trace Data and Interviews. Tech Know Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09789-4
Ateş, H., et Köroğlu, M. (2024). Online collaborative tools for science education: Boosting learning outcomes, motivation, and engagement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40, 1052-1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12931
Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84–94.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069
Barab, S. (2022). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for engineering change. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 177-195). Third edition. Cambridge University Press.
Barron, B. (2003). When Smart Groups Fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
Beaudoin, J., Laferrière, T., Collin, S., Ruel, C. et Voyer, S. (2022). Rapport ÉVA : Équité et Valeur Ajoutée dans les usages du numérique pour l’enseignement et l’apprentissage. CTREQ. https://www.ctreq.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CTREQ-Rapport-EVA_VF-6.pdf
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Boud, D., et Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3),400-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
Bransford, J. D., Barron, B., Pea, R., Meltzoff, A., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., Stevens, R., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Reeves, B., Roschelle, J., et Sabelli, N. (2006). Foundations and opportunities for an interdisciplinary science of learning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 9–34). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.003
Breuleux, A., Erickson, G., Laferrière, T. et Lamon, M. (2002). Devis sociotechniques pour l’établissement de communautés d’apprentissage en réseau : Principes de conception et conditions de réussite résultant de plusieurs cycles d’intégration pédagogique des TIC. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 28 (2), 411-434. http://www.erudit.org/revue/rse/2002/v28/n2/007361ar.html?vue=resume
Carless, D., et Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Chen, W., Hu, H., Lyu, Q., et Zheng, L. (2024). Using peer feedback to improve critical thinking in computer‐supported collaborative argumentation: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13078
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
Danic, I., Lefort, T., et Mell, L. (2024). Aux sources des inégalités face au numérique, le rapport des enseignants du secondaire aux technologies numériques : retrait, appropriation ou partage ?, Recherches en éducation, 55. https://doi.org/10.4000/ree.12402
Demir, M., et Zengin, Y. (2023). The effect of a technology-enhanced collaborative learning environment on secondary school students' mathematical reasoning: A mixed method design. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11587-x
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., et Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
Dubé, F., Granger, N. et Dufour, F. (2015). Continuing Education for High School Resource Teachers and Their Sense of Self-efficacy. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 707-712. doi: 10.12691/education-3-6-7
Earl, L.M. (2003). Assessment as learning using classroom assessment to maximise student learning. Corwin Press.
Eccles, J. S. (2016). Engagement: Where to next? Learning and Instruction, 43, 71-75.
Engeström, Y. (1987, 2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research, 2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., et Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gee, J. P. (1999/2005). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method. Routledge.
Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 197-213.
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(03)00068-9
Hattie (2017). L’apprentissage visible pour les enseignants (M. Denis, trad.). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., et Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic Learning Environments. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, M. Bishop, (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_32
Jeong, H., Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., et Kihyun Jo, K. (2019). Ten years of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: A meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005–2014. Educational Research Review, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100284
Johnson, D. W., et Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
Kerman, N.T., Banihashem, S.K., Karami, M., Er, E., Van Ginkel, S., et Noroozi, O. (2024). Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 763–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12273-8
Laferrière, T., Baron, G.-L. et Cox, M. J. (2020). Résultats de l’Edusummit 2019 au service de l’innovation pour l’éducation formelle des jeunes. Revue Adjectif : analyses et recherches sur les TICE. https://adjectif.net//spip.php?article510
Laferrière, T., Parent, S., Deschênes, M. et Barma, S. (2022). L’engagement de l’élève, de l’étudiante ou de l’étudiant : construit revisité selon une perspective socioculturelle. Revue Internationale Du CRIRES : Innover Dans La Tradition De Vygotsky, 6 (1), 111–135.
https://revues.ulaval.ca/ojs/index.php/RIC/article/view/51525/409
Laferrière, T., Tremblay, M., Nadeau-Tremblay, S., Allaire, S., Boisjoly, F., Delobbe, A.-M., Ntebutse, J. G., Robert Mazaye, C., Barma, S., Nicole, M.C., Beaudoin, J. et Bernatchez, J. (2024). L’Évaluation Collaborative Réussie des Apprentissages par le Numérique. FRQSC. https://frq.gouv.qc.ca/app/uploads/2024/03/rapport_lecran_therese-laferriere.pdf
Laveault, D., et Allal, L. (eds.) (2016). Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation. Springer.
Lave, J., et Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lazonder, A. W., et Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
Leavy, A. M., Dick, L., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Paparistodemou, E., et Stylianou, E. (2023). The prevalence and use of emerging technologies in STEAM education: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12806
Lijedahl, P. (2020). Building Thinking Classrooms in Mathematics, Grades K-12. 14 Teaching Practices for Enhancing Learning. Cowin Edition.
Maričić, M., et Lavicza, Z. Enhancing student engagement through emerging technology integration in STEAM learning environments. Education and Information Technologies (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12710-2
Marion C., Laferrière T. et Tremblay-Gagnon D. (2022). Rétroaction par les pairs : quelles conditions pour un apport optimal aux apprentissages des étudiantes et étudiants?. Revue internationale du CRIRES : innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, 6 (1), (pp. 52-72). https://revues.ulaval.ca/ojs/index.php/RIC/article/view/51446
Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., et Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187–199.
Monney, N., Major, C., Robert-Mazaye, C., Laferrière, T. et Foynard, M. (soumis). La rétroaction constructive par les pairs : exemples de situations d’apprentissage et de retombées sur la motivation et les apprentissages des élèves. Les rencontres du REF 2024.
Mottier Lopez, L., Girardet, C. et Naji, T. (2021). L’évaluation continue pour apprendre : enjeux de la pluralité des feedbacks entre pairs dans un cours universitaire. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 44 (2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.7202/1090461ar
Nadeau-Tremblay, S., Tremblay, P. et Desgagné, C. (2024). Apprendre le jugement critique à travers la rétroaction par les pairs. Vivre le primaire, 37 (2), 64-66.
Nadeau-Tremblay, S., Tremblay, M., Laferrière, T. et Allaire, S. (2022). Les enjeux et défis d’accompagnement d’enseignantes et d’enseignants dans l’évaluation des apprentissages à l’aide de technologies collaboratives au primaire et au secondaire. Médiations et médiatisations, 9, 7-27.
https://revue-mediations.teluq.ca/index.php/Distances/article/view/249/208
Olsson, J. (2017). The contribution of reasoning to the utilization of feedback from software when solving mathematical problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9795-x
Pasquini, R. (2019). Élargir conceptuellement le modèle de l’alignement curriculaire pour comprendre la cohérence des pratiques évaluatives sommatives notées des enseignants : enjeux et perspectives. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 42 (1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.7202/1066598ar
Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Continuities and discontinuities: Future directions for research in educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 29(3), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2903_3
Raynault, A. et Laferrière, T. (2024). Collaborer à l’aide du numérique : fondements et affordances. Collaborer à l’aide du numérique : fondements et affordances. Dans F. Michelot et S. Collin. La compétence numérique en contexte éducatif. Regards croisés et perspectives internationales (pp. 179-203). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, et C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer.
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 579-595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
Reeve, J., et Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., et Jang, H. (2020). How and why students make academic progress: Reconceptualizing the student engagement construct to increase its explanatory power. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101899
Rodet, J. (2000). La rétroaction, support d’apprentissage ? DistanceS. https://edutice.hal.science/edutice-00000482
Rogoff, B. (2014). Learning by observing and pitching in to family and community endeavors: An orientation. Human Development, 57(2-3), 69-81.
Rogoff, B. (2017). Participer pour apprendre. Réseau PÉRISCOPE. https://periscope-r.quebec/rogoff_final.pdf
Roth, W.-M., Radford, L., et LaCroix, L. (2012). Working With Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Qualitative Social Research, 13 (2). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1814/3380
Salomon, G. (1995). Reflections on the field of educational psychology by the outgoing journal editor. Educational Psychologist, 30(3),105–108. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3003_1
Scardamalia, M., et Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3
Scardamalia, M., et Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97-118). Cambridge University Press. https://ikit.org/fulltext/2006_KBTheory.pdf
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69.
Slotta, J. D. (2014). Knowledge community and inquiry: new opportunities for scripting and orchestration. Paper presented at the Network of Associated Programs in the Learning Sciences (NAPLES) (Munich)
Stahl, G. (2009). Studying virtual math teams. Springer. La version prépublication est disponible à http://gerrystahl.net/elibrary/svmt/
Topping, K. J. (2023). Digital peer assessment in school teacher education and development: a systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 38(3), 472-498, https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.196
Tremblay, M. et Delobbe, A.-M. (À paraitre). L’évaluation continue pour apprendre durablement : s’inviter en mathématiques. Actes du 50e colloque Copirelem tenu à Bonneuil-sur-Marne.
Tsayem Tchoupou, A., Laferrière, T. et Baron, J. (2023). Analyse des outils et instruments numériques pour l’évaluation des apprentissages. https://adjectif.net/IMG/pdf/intruments_apprentissage_at__tl_glb_normes_ok_corrige_.pdf
Vali (2022). The Impact of Technology on Collaborative Learning. 9th International Conference Edu World 2022 Education Facing Contemporary World Issues, Romania. European Proceedings of Educational Sciences. https://www.europeanproceedings.com/article/10.15405/epes.23045.13
Van Hoe, A., Wiebe, J., Rotsaert, T., et Schellens, T. (2024). The implementation of peer assessment as a scaffold during computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning in secondary STEM education. International journal of STEM Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00465-8
Van Leeuwen, A., et Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27(June), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001
Voogt, J. M., Erstad, O., Dede, C., et Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029
Voogt, J. M., Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R., Hickey, D. T., et McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43, 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice – Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press. Traduction par Fernand Gervais.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mid: Socio-cultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.
Wiggins, G., et McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design, expanded (2nd ed.). Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wu, XY. (2024). Exploring the effects of digital technology on deep learning: a meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 425–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12307-1
Yang, X. (2023). A Historical Review of Collaborative Learning and Cooperative Learning. TechTrends, 67, 718–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9
Yang, Y., Vvan Aalst, J., et Chan, C. K. K. (2020). Dynamics of Reflective Assessment and Knowledge Building for Academically Low-Achieving Students. American Educational Research Journal, 57(3), 1241-1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219872444
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Thérèse Laferrière, Mélanie Tremblay, Sophie Nadeau-Tremblay, France Boisjoly, Stéphane Allaire 2025
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.