Learning design for teacher-student co-agency in hybrid spaces
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.51657/ric.v7i1.51883Mots-clés :
emergent technology, hybridity, agency, zone of possibility, teacher-studentRésumé
This paper reflects on hybrid learning design focusing on co-agency between teachers and students. The research question is: How could learning design with technology leverage the hybridity of the learning environment and teacher and student co-agency for post-pandemic learning? To answer this question, we examine academic publications for related studies to derive possible post-Covid learning design principles to answer the research question. Aligned with the focus of bridging hybridity, we draw on studies involving different emerging technologies from two different contexts: France and Singapore. The implications for hybridity, co-agency, and zone of possibility are analysed. The discussion stresses the virtual, material, and agentic transformation in hybrid learning design for a post-pandemic learning design.
Références
Ang, Q. (Oct 2021). Not everyone has right environment for HBL, which should be used as last resort: Chan Chun Sing. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/parenting-education/not-everyone-has-right-environment-for-hbl-which-should-be-used-as
Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 28(3), 801-831. https://doi/abs/10.1086/345321
Becker, H. J., & Riel, M. M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructivist-compatible computer use. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey. Report# 7.
Castañeda, L., Attwell, G., & Dabbagh, N. (2023). Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the networked ecosystems with people agency: Presentation of the special issue. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 23(71).
Cook, J., Mor, Y., & Santos, P. (2020). Three cases of hybridity in learning spaces: Towards a design for a Zone of Possibility. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1155-1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12945
Cremers, P. H. M., Wals, A. E. J., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2017). Utilisation of design principles for hybrid learning configurations by interprofessional design teams. Instructional Science, 45(2), 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9398-5
Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. Routledge.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1975). Qu’est-ce qu’une littérature mineure ? Kafka. Pour une littérature mineure, 29-50.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Dziuban, C., Graham, C.R., Moskal, P.D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., & DeLiema, D. (2015). Constructing liminal blends in a collaborative, augmented-reality learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9207-1
Fawns, T., Markauskaite, L., Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2021). H2m pedagogy: Designing for hybrid learning in medical education. Hybrid learning spaces. Springer International.
Gérin-Lajoie, Serge; Roy, Normand et Lafleur, France (2022). La comodalité : De quoi parle-t-on et que savons-nous sur ce mode de formation ?. Communication présentée au Colloque "La formation à distance en comodalité au temps des bilans postpandémiques" dans le cadre du 89e congrès annuel de l'Association francophone pour le savoir (ACFAS), Québec, Canada.
Gobeil-Proulx, J. (2019). La perspective étudiante sur la formation comodale, ou hybride flexible. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 16(1), 56-67.
Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Braten, I. (2016). An introduction to epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 1-15). Routledge.
Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., & Dohn, N. B. (2014, April). Design for networked learning: framing relations between participants' activities and the physical setting. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on networked learning (pp. 137-144).
Haraway, Donna J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
Hirst, E., & Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (2006). Patrolling the borders of otherness: Dis/placed identity positions for teachers and students in schooled spaces. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(3), 205-227. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1303_4
Impedovo, M. A., & Gadille, M. (2021). Embodiment in knots of sense-making between learning physical and virtual configurations. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(2), 145-162.
Laferrière, T., & Cox, M. (2021). Editorial: Systemic perspectives on new alignments during COVID-19: Digital challenges and opportunities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 47(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28158
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oup Oxford.
LaViola Jr, J. J., Kruijff, E., McMahan, R. P., Bowman, D., & Poupyrev, I. P. (2017). 3D user interfaces: theory and practice. Addison-Wesley Professional.
Lin, F., & Chan, C. K. (2018). Examining the role of computer-supported knowledge-building discourse in epistemic and conceptual understanding. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12261
Lim, F. V., & Toh, W. (2022). Design considerations for digital learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Losses and gains. In S. Tan & M. E. K. Lin (Eds.), Discourses, modes, media and meaning in an era of pandemic (pp. 69-88). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003168195-7
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The internet and higher education, 29, 40-48.
OCDE (2021), The State of Global Education: 18 Months into the Pandemic, Éditions OCDE, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1a23bb23-en.
Matusov, E. (2020). A student's right to freedom of education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8, SF1-SF28. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.356
Matusov, E. (2022). The teachers' pedagogical fiduciary duty to their students. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1-26.
Ramlowat, D. D., & Pattanayak, B. K. (2019). Exploring the internet of things (IoT) in education: a review. In Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications (pp. 245-255). Springer.
Rodriguez, R. C., & Liu, C. Y. (2019). Evaluation of the impact of the Hyflex learning model. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 25(4), 393-410.
Rosborough, A. (2016). Understanding relations between gesture and chronotope: Embodiment and meaning-making in a second-language classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(2), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1121400
Proulx, T.; Inzlicht, M. (2012). The Five "A" s of Meaning Maintenance: Finding meaning in the Theories of Sense-Making. Psycholoy Inquiry 23, 317–335.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (2nd Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 397-417). Cambridge University Press.
Schraube, E. (2009). Technology as materialised action and its ambivalences. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 296-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309103543
Tan, S. C., Chue, S., & Teo, C. L. (2016). Teacher learning in a professional learning community: Potential for a dual-layer knowledge building. In C. K. Looi, J. Polman, U. Cress & P. Reimann (Eds.), Transforming learning, empowering learners. 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 178-185). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
Teo, C. L., Tan, S. C., & Chan, C. (2021). Pedagogical transformation and teacher learning for knowledge building: Turning COVID-19 challenges into opportunities. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 47(4), 1-26. https://cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/28057
Tchounikine, P. (2019). Learners' agency and CSCL technologies: towards an emancipatory perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(2), 237-250. https://10_1007-S11412-019-09302-5
Teo, C. L., & Manasi, P. (2021). Knowledge building and young children: Learning sciences and early childhood pedagogy. Early Educators (pp.26-39). Singapore: Association For Early Childhood Educators.
UNESCO Report. (2020). New UNESCO Report shows extent of global inequalities in education and calls for greater inclusion as schools re-open. https://en.unesco.org/news/GEM-Report-2020
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
Yates, A., Starkey, L., Egerton, B. & Flueggen, F. (2021). High school students' experience of online learning during Covid-19: the influence of technology and pedagogy, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854337
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Marie Antonietta Impedovo, Seng Chee TAN 2023
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.