Defining creativity as a meaning-making process in education

Authors

  • Alexandra Bernier Université Laval

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51657/ric.v6i2.51556

Keywords:

creativity, education, menaing-making, problem-solving, sociocultural approach

Abstract

While today's societies are exposed to strong competition, due to the importance placed on technological and human innovation in all economic sectors, creativity, a key skill of the 21st century, is sought after by employers (De Backer & al., 2012; Lubart & al., 2015; Mnisri & Nagati, 2012; Pantaleo, 2019; Romero, Lille & Patiño, 2017; Upitis, 2014). Institutional documents acknowledge its transversal value in student development (MEQ, 2006). Despite this, in education, defining, teaching and evaluating this skill can become complex for teachers (Alter & al., 2009; De Backer & al., 2012; Pantaleo, 2019), like in the field of arts where the created object takes a decisive, even total, place in the evaluation of the student's abilities, the latter not always being the witness of learning (Boyd & Cutcher, 2015; Geist & Hohn, 2009; Rosenfeld, 2014). It is proposed to pay particular attention to the creative process and its contribution to transversal skills, in order to describe creativity as meaning meaking in education. This sociocultural perspective makes it possible to consider the learning process of the student when he creates, rather than taking into account only his result. The article is divided into four parts: a historical definition of creativity in research, a description of the concept in the field of Quebec education, a conceptual reflection on the creative process, then the definition of creativity as a process of meaning making, to express it as a fundamentally sociocultural activity.

References

Aljughaiman, A. et Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers' Conceptions of Creativity and Creative Students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01247.x

Allal, L. et Mottier Lopez, L. (2007). Régulation des apprentissages en situation scolaire et en formation. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur.

Alter, F., Hays, T. et O’Hara, R. (2009). Creative arts teaching and practice: Critical reflections of primary school teachers in Australia. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 10(9). http://www.ijea.org/v10n9/

Barth, B.-M. (2001). L’apprentissage de l’abstraction. Paris, France : RETZ.

Barth, B.-M. (2013). Élève chercheur, enseignant médiateur : Donner du sens aux savoirs. Paris, France: RETZ.

Barth, B.-M. (2015). Le savoir en construction. Paris, France : RETZ.

Bernier, A. (2019). Interprétation d’une œuvre d’art par l’enseignant : sens et abstraction. [mémoire de maîtrise, Université Laval]. CorpusUL. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/34938

Bonneau, C. (2011). Co-configuration d'une plateforme à code source ouvert en organisation : analyser la transformation d'un outil et des pratiques de travail avec la théorie de l'activité. Revue internationale de communication sociale et publique. 2011(5), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.4000/communiquer.417

Boyd, W. et Cutcher, L. (2015). Learning from early childhood philosophy, theory and pedagogy: Inspiring effective art education. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood. 40(1), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911504000112

Capron Puozzo, I. (Ed.). (2016). La créativité en éducation et en formation. Perspectives théoriques et pratiques. Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgique : De Boeck.

De Backer, F., Lombaerts, K., De Mette, T., Buffel, T. et Elias, W. (2012). Creativity in Artistic Education: Introducing Artists into Primary Schools. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 31(1), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2012.01715.x

Eindhoven, J. E. et Vicacke, W. E. (1952). Creative processes in painting. Journal of General Psychology, 47(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1952.9710660

Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2e éd.). Cambridge University Press.

Filiod, J. (2011). Au-delà de l'art : Créativité et expérience esthésique. Gérontologie et société, 34(137), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.3917/gs.137.0037

Fredriksen, B. (2010). Meaning making, democratic participation and art in early childhood education: Can inspiring objects structure dynamic curricula?. International Journal of Education Through Art, 6(3), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta.6.3.381_1

Geist, E. et Hohn, J. (2009). Encouraging Creativity in the Face of Administrative Convenience: How Our Schools Discourage Divergent Thinking. Education 130(1). 141 150. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A207643772/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=googleScholar&xid=39f0da0e

Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454. https://doi-org.acces.bibl.ulaval.ca/10.1037/h0063487

Herzig, B. et Aßmann, S. (2014). How to define media in a mediatized society? a media pedagogical proposal inspired by theoretical ideas of castells, Luhmann and Peirce. Medienpädagogik: Zeitschrift Für Theorie Und Praxis Der Medienbildung, 24, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/24/2014.07.18.X

Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J. et Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29 (2), 160-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001

Kampylis, P., Berki, E. et Saariluoma, P. (2009). In-service and prospective teachers’ conceptions of creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 4(1). 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.10.001

Legendre, R. (2005). Assimilation-accommodation. Dans Dictionnaire actuel de l'éducation (3e éd., p.132). Guérin.

Legendre, R. (2005). Cognition. Dans Dictionnaire actuel de l'éducation (3e éd., p.227). Guérin.

Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S. et Zenasni, F. (2015). Psychologie de la créativité (2e éd.). Paris, France: Armand Colin.

Mayer, R. E. (1977). Thinking and problem solving: An introduction to human cognition and learning. Scott Foresman.

Meyer, G. S. et Eilifsen, M. (2017). The challenges of creativity in Norwegian Early Childhood Teacher Education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(3), 425‑435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2017.1308166

Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec (2006). Programme de formation de l'école québécoise: éducation préscolaire, enseignement primaire. Québec, QC : Gouvernement du Québec. http://www4.banq.qc.ca/pgq/2006/3127968.pdf

Miri, I. (2020). Cerveau et apprentissage (Ser. Mes cerveaux et moi). EDP Sciences. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ulaval/detail.action?docID=6037205

Mnisri, K. et Nagati, H. (2012). Une étude exploratoire de la créativité dans les organisations. Question(s) de management, 1, 37-57. https://doi.org/10.3917/qdm.122.0037

Oral, G. (2008). Creative learning and culture. Dans A. Craft, T. Cremin et P. Burnard (dir.), Creative learning 3 - 11: And how we document it. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.

Pantaleo, S. (2019). Creativity and elementary students’ multimodal narrative representations. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 42(1). 17-27. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Creativity+and+elementary+students%27+multimodal+narrative...-a0571514309

Piaget, J. (1975). L’équilibration des structures cognitives: Problème central du développement. Presses Universitaires de France.

Poissant, H., Poëllhuber, B., Falardeau, M. (1994). Résolution de problèmes, autorégulation et apprentissage. Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 19(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1495305

Polya, G. (1971). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. (2e éd.). Princeton University Press.

Rajotte, T. (2017). L’enseignement et l’apprentissage par la résolution de problèmes mathématiques: quelles stratégies privilégier? Vivre le primaire, 30(2), 22-15. https://aqep.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/L%E2%80%99enseignement-et-l%E2%80%99apprentissage-par-la-re%CC%81solution-de-proble%CC%80mes-mathe%CC%81matiques-_-quelles-strate%CC%81gie.pdf

Romero, M., Lille, B. et Patiño, A. (2017). Usages créatifs du numérique pour l'apprentissage au XXIe siècle. Presses de l’Université du Québec. https://doi-org.acces.bibl.ulaval.ca/10.2307/j.ctt1vw0rkx

Rosenfeld, M. (2014). ALT/space 12(3). Teaching Artist Journal, 12(3), 177 188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15411796.2014.909212

Rutherford, G. (2011). A Model of Assimilation and Accommodation in the Cognitive & Cultural Realms. Dynamical Psychology. http://www.dynapsyc.org/2011/Rutherford_2011.pdf

Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Wallas’ Four-Stage Model of the Creative Process: More Than Meets the Eye?, Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1087277

Sannino, A. L., Daniels, H. et Gutiérrez, K. D. (2009). Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge University Press.

Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: the science of human innovation. (2e éd.). Oxford University Press.

Starbuck, W. H. and Milliken, F. J. (1988). Executives’ perceptual filters: what they notice and how they make sense. Dans D. C. Hambrick (dir.), The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers (35–65). JAI Press. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2708156

Sternberg, R.J. et Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). Guilford's Structure of Intellect Model and Model of Creativity: Contributions and Limitations, Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 309-316, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_08

Tomljenović, Z. (2015). An Interactive Approach to Learning and Teaching in Visual Arts Education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5, 75-95. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.129

Upitis, R. (2014). Créativité : l’état des lieux. People for education – mesurer ce qui compte. http://peopleforeducation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/People-for-Education-Mesurer-ce-qui-compte-Creativite-1.pdf

Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and Creativity in Childhood, Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(1), 7-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210

Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. Université du Michigan, MI : J. Cape.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-15

How to Cite

Defining creativity as a meaning-making process in education. (2022). International Review of CRIRES: Innovating in the Tradition of Vygotsky, 6(3), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.51657/ric.v6i2.51556