Interactions between critical pedagogy and cultural-historical activity theory in the context of teaching innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51657/ric.v6i3.51687Keywords:
cultural-historical activity theory, critical pedagogy, teaching practices, political forces, social changeAbstract
Several challenges face teachers who wish to change their practices to move away from the top-down approach. These challenges are more associated with cultural factors than individual factors, including the school environment and the educational systems in place. To understand how these cultural elements influence the choice of teaching practices and the willingness of teachers to do things differently, the framework of cultural-historical activity theory is interesting. However, it is possible to improve it with regard to the political aspects of education using certain concepts of the critical pedagogy philosophy. This article discusses possible contributions of critical pedagogy to the framework of cultural-historical activity theory in addressing the challenges associated with teaching innovation. While many elements of teaching practice can be studied from the perspective of these two streams, a literature rewiew on their complementarities and similarities has identified two interrelated themes: the effect of political forces on the choice of teaching approaches and the importance of questioning in changing mindsets. At the end of the analysis, we were able to map out the stages of individual consciousness-raising using important concepts from the third generation of cultural-historical activity theory.
References
Ares, N. (2006). Political Aims and Classroom Dynamics: Generative Processes in Classroom Communities, Radical Pedagogy, 8 (2), 12-20.
Barma, S. (2008). Vers une lecture systémique du contexte, des enjeux et des contraintes du renouvellement des pratiques en éducation aux sciences au secondaire au Québec. Revue Canadienne des jeunes chercheurs en éducation, 1 (1).
Barma, S. (2010). Analyse d’une démarche de transformation de pratique en sciences, dans le cadre du nouveau programme de formation au secondaire, à la lumière de la théorie de l’activité. Canadian Journal of Education, 33 (4),677–710.
Bhutani Vij, A. (2021) The neoliberal agenda of workplace learning in NGOs : contestation, narratives and resistance, Studies in Continuing Education, 43:2, 208-222, DOI : 10.1080/0158037X.2020.1787370.
Collins, C. (2011). Reflections on CHAT and Freire’s Participatory Action Research From the West of Scotland: Praxis, Politics, and the “Struggle For Meaningful Life”, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18 (2), 98–114, DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2010.484098
Collins, C. & Lister, J. (1996). Hands ups or heads up? Community work, democracy and the language of “partnership.” In M. Shaw & I. Cooke (Eds.), Radical community work: Perspectives from practice in Scotland (pp. 26–45). Edinburgh, Scotland: Moray House.
De Lima, V. A., & Rodrigues Dias, M. A. (2018). Paulo Freire, au-delà de l’alphabétisation des adultes, l’émancipation. Revue internationale d’éducation de Sèvres, 79, 157-167. https://doi.org/10.4000/ries.7198
Deslandes, R., Barma, S. & Beaumier, F. (2020). Collaborative school-family relationships using the expansive learning cycle to enhance parents’ empowerment in helping their child in the context of a new reading method. International Journal about parents in education, 12(1), 47–61.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1997). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Dans Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen et R. —L. Punamäki (dir.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge, R.-U. : Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams. Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. Dans Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen et R. —L. Punamäki (dir.), Perspectives on activity theory (p. 377–404). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity-theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.
Engestrom, Y. & Pyorala, E. (2021). Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning. Medical Teacher, 43(1), 7–13. doi: 10.1080/0142159 × .2020.1795105
Engestrôm, Y. & Sannino, A. (2021). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions : four generations of activity-theoritical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture and Activity, 28(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
Freire, P. (2021). La pédagogie des opprimé·es. Éditions de la rue Dorion.
Giroux, H.A. (2020). On Critical Pedagogy. London: Bloomsbury Academic. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350145016.ch-004
Graziano, K. J. (2008). Walk the talk: Connecting critical pedagogy and practice in teacher education, Teaching Education, 19(2), 153–163, DOI: 10.1080/10,476,210,802,040,740
Ilenkov, E. V. (1982). The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx’s Capital. Éditions du Progrès, Moscou.
Lektorsky, V. A. (2009). Mediation as a Mean of Collective Activity. Dans Sannino, Daniels et Gutiérrez. Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge Universtiy Press.
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. New Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Mayo, P. (2021). Marxist-inflected praxis in Paulo Freire’s political pedagogy. Debates em educaçao, 13, 82-99. https://doi.org/10.28998/2175-6600.2021v13nEspp82-99
Meirieu, P. (2020). Ce que l’école peut encore pour la démocratie. Deux ou trois choses que je sais (peut-être) de l’éducation et de la pédagogie. Paris Autrement.
Miettinen, R. (2006). The sources of novelty: a cultural and systemic view of disturbed creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management. 15 (2), 173–181.
Pereira, I. (2016). Introduction à la pédagogie critique. Questions de classe(s). https://www.questionsdeclasses.org/introduction-a-la-pedagogie-critique/
Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 471–491.
Tochon, F. V. (2011). Le savoir-évaluer comme politique éducative : vers une évaluation plus profonde. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 34(3), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.7202/1024798ar
Viau-Guay, A. & Hamel, C. (2017). L’expérimentation de nouveaux modèles d’action pédagogique au sein d’une communauté professionnelle d’apprentissage en formation professionnelle. Revue Canadienne de l’Éducation, 40 (3), 123-157.
Virkkunen, J. & Newnham, D. S. (2013). The change laboratory. A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Rotterdam, Pays-Bas : Sense Publishers.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1985). Pensée et langage. (F. Sève, Trans.). Paris: Messidor/Éditions sociales. (Original work published 1934).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jessy Turcotte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.